Skip to content
BlackBadger

monday.com to AI

Your monday.com renewal is when the seat blocks can finally come off

Every year the board count grows. A few more people need more than read access, so another block of seats gets bought. The automations that were the reason you chose the tool hit the monthly meter, so the plan moves up a tier, for every seat. Then the renewal lands, bigger than last year, and it gets signed anyway, because the alternative is migrating forty boards in the two weeks before the date.

None of that is a verdict on monday.com. It's a verdict on the renewal, which is the one point in the year when leaving costs you a decision and nothing else, and the only point where the seat count is still yours to negotiate. This page is what to do with it.

In short

  • Black Badger Software Solutions is a custom software development company in Clearwater, Florida that replaces monday.com with an operations system your company owns outright, built around how your work actually flows.
  • We were a monday.com partner. We ended that partnership to build these replacements, so we know where the boards are strong and exactly where they stop fitting.
  • An owned system has no seat blocks, no automation meter and no plan tier, and every account it runs on, from the code repository to the database and hosting, is created in your name.
  • Your boards, items, updates and files come out through monday's export and API, connected boards become real relationships, the automation recipes are rebuilt as tested code, and monday.com keeps running until the new system is proven.
  • After launch the system costs roughly $100 to $200 a month to run for a smaller company, and $2,000 to $3,000 a month at enterprise scale. Those are hosting and service bills you pay the providers directly, with no license and no per-user fee.

Where we stand

We were a monday.com partner. Here is why we left.

Black Badger was a monday.com partner. We implemented it, supported it, built the board structures, the connect and mirror columns and the automation recipes, across operations, marketing and project teams, and we made money doing it. Then we ended that partnership and the others like it, and we started building the replacements.

It was a change of business model, and it cost us the partner revenue. We did it because the same conversation kept happening. A client liked the boards. By the fortieth board they had mirror columns everywhere, an automation meter they kept hitting, dashboards that could not see across all of it, and a spreadsheet beside the tool doing the budget and the report.

When a firm stops selling what it used to sell, the reason is worth hearing. That was ours.

Your own arithmetic

The seat count is not the number

Before you compare anything to anything, get your own figure. Most teams surprise themselves. Do this before the call, not on it.

Seats, in blocks, at next year's headcount

Seats sell in blocks with a minimum, so you pay for empty ones, and anyone who needs more than read access becomes a paid seat. Work out what the same setup costs at the headcount you expect in three years. A per-seat model puts a price on your own growth.

The tier you bought for the automations

Automations and integrations are metered per month by plan. Count the recipes that run, then count which plan tier you moved up to so they would keep running, and remember that the tier applied to every seat. The automation you bought the tool for is often the reason the invoice doubled.

The person who understands the mirror columns

Somewhere in your company is the one person who knows how the forty boards connect. Count the fraction of their salary that goes into keeping the structure alive, because that's part of what the platform costs. Then count what happens when they leave.

The work that happens outside the boards

The budget in a spreadsheet because formula columns can't roll up across boards. The status meeting that only exists because nobody trusts the dashboard. The report assembled by export because dashboards read a limited number of boards. That is usually the biggest number on the list.

The renewal window

What to settle before the seats renew

These get decided for you if you wait. None of them need a conversation with us.

  • Find your actual renewal date and notice period

    Annual plans renew unless notice lands ahead of the date, and missing that window commits you to another term at the new seat count. Read the agreement first. Everything below only works inside that window.

  • Take a real copy of your boards

    Every board exported to Excel, items, updates and files pulled through the API, stored somewhere you control whether or not you ever leave. File links in the export expire, so download the attachments while the account is live. A backup you've never tested isn't a backup.

  • Write the automation recipes down

    Recipes have no export at all. The rules that move items, assign owners and send reminders survive only in the settings screen, so list them while the boards are live. The list usually shrinks, because a lot of recipes only exist to copy a value across a mirror column.

  • Decide what a replacement has to cover on day one

    Almost nobody needs everything at once. The pain is usually concentrated in one department or one workflow. Replace that first, leave the rest running with a sync between them, and you get something cheaper and a lot less frightening than a full cutover.

Leaving

What leaving actually involves

Boards export to Excel and the API returns items, subitems, column values, updates and files, so the data comes out. Each board gets mapped into a real structure. Mirror columns come back as their source ids, formula columns are computed in the view and not stored, and subitems arrive as their own set, so the mapping is where the real work is. Forty boards that drifted from one template become one structure that keeps applying.

The automation recipes get read for the rules they enforce and rebuilt as ordinary code with no monthly meter. The ones that only patched a board limitation get dropped. Integrations that were burning through the allowance get built directly against the systems they talk to.

Both systems run side by side while the new one gets checked against the old one. Task counts, dates, budget rollups, and the executive dashboard against the spreadsheet it replaces. Nothing gets switched off because a project plan says so. It goes off when the numbers match and people have stopped opening the old boards. The system is built on accounts in your name, we're added as administrators, and you can remove us. There's no renewal conversation at the end of this, because there's nobody to renew with.

One time we said no to a renewal

$125,000 a year in licensing, replaced in six weeks for $85,000.

Another client was paying $125,000 a year to rent software that still needed workarounds. Six weeks and $85,000 later they owned the replacement outright, with no seat count and no renewal.

More of the work

The honest case against

When we tell people to stay

If your team's work really is a list of things moving through statuses, a content calendar, a hiring pipeline, a request queue, and the board is the part people like, replacing monday.com is the wrong project. Fix the reporting beside it, or fold the one workflow that hurts into something that writes back to the boards. Smaller job. It keeps every option open.

If your company is small enough that everyone can see everything and nobody has hit a plan limit, the renewal is probably fine. Leaving is not the question. We'll tell you that on the call, and you won't be reading it for the first time in a proposal.

Questions

What people ask before leaving monday.com

Answered in full, including the cost and timing questions, which get a process rather than a figure.

We renew in a few weeks. Is it too late to do anything?

Depends on your notice period, which is why that's the first thing to check. If the window has already closed, you renew, and then you've got twelve months to do this properly instead of two weeks. If the window is still open, the useful conversation is about which boards a replacement covers first. Nobody is replacing forty boards before your date.

We run the whole company on monday.com. Can we move before the renewal without stopping work?

Yes, in pieces. One department or one workflow moves first while everything else stays put, the two run side by side with items and statuses flowing between them through the API, and each remaining piece becomes its own decision once the first one has been trusted for a while.

What happens to the automations and integrations we built?

They get listed while the account is live, because recipes have no export, then read and rebuilt as code with no monthly action limit. The list usually shrinks. A lot of recipes in a mature workspace only exist to copy a value across a mirror column or work around something a board can't represent. Fix the structure and they've got nothing left to do.

Is a custom system risky if the developer disappears?

That used to be the honest risk with custom software, and it's why businesses defaulted to platforms in the first place. It's a much smaller risk now. The system gets written so any competent developer working with current AI tooling can read it and extend it, and every account it runs on is in your name from day one. Nobody can hold your operations hostage, us included.

How does the cost of replacing monday.com compare with the renewal?

It depends on how many boards and recipes have to be replaced, how many people use it, and what the new system has to talk to. So we don't publish a rate card. The anchor is what you already pay every year across every seat block and the plan tier. After a strategy call you get a written scope naming every deliverable and what it costs, set against that number.

Where is monday.com genuinely the right tool?

Where the visual board is the point. A team whose work is a list of things moving through statuses, who need to be up and running without anyone technical, and whose process is still changing too fast to build around, gets something out of monday.com that a custom system can't give them yet. Small companies where everyone sees everything and nobody has hit a plan limit do well on it too. We implemented it for years for exactly those teams. If that's you, keep it and fix how it's set up.

What comes out of monday.com in an export, and what does not?

Boards export to Excel, and the API gives you items, subitems, column values, updates and files. The part that took longest to build is the part that stays behind. Mirror columns show a value they never store, formula columns are computed in the view and can export empty, automation recipes have no export at all, and dashboards are configuration, so there's nothing to take away. File links expire. We write that rebuild list down early, before anyone gives notice, so you know the size of it going in.

Can we keep monday.com running while the replacement is built?

Yes, and for anything the company depends on it's the only sane way to do it. The new system gets built alongside the live workspace, importing on a schedule through the API, so both hold the same picture. People move over in groups, never in one jump, and while a department is still on monday.com the two stay connected both ways so nobody re-keys anything. You cancel the subscription at the end of that, not the start.

From the knowledge base

Guides for people weighing up monday.com

Reference pages, not sales pages. Each one is useful even if you decide to stay exactly where you are.

All guides

Bring your renewal quote

Thirty minutes with your invoice and your seat count in front of you, and you will know whether replacing monday.com is realistic for your company, including when the honest answer is that it is not.

No newsletter, no drip sequence. One reply from a person.